Problems encountered within the utilization of the literature review and techniques to re solve them

Problems encountered within the utilization of the literature review and techniques to re solve them

In this essay, postgraduate pupils can find out about the issues encountered in the utilization of the literary works review and how to re solve them.

Lack of literary works on the subject

Whenever looking both domestic and international literature, look closely at the search words used by you: issues with the look for literary works could be due to making use of wrong terms.

For a number of scientific areas, domestic experts have done never as research than international people. Therefore, when you yourself have maybe not discovered domestic literature about them, perhaps you are in a position to discover foreign literature. To begin with, you really need to rely on the Medline database.

You need to adjust the plan of the defense based on real possibilities if you still can not find literature on your topic. As well, the current situation should be reported into the scientific frontrunner in a timely manner. In medical works, as an example, you can easily post materials on epidemiology, etiology, pathogenesis, center, treatment and diagnosis types of the studied illness, along with historical guide.

If the review is specialized in the scholarly study of this effectiveness associated with the procedure, one could describe:

  • its history,
  • process of action,
  • its application and its own effectiveness in several areas of medication;
  • description of alternative therapies with an increased exposure of their effectiveness that is insufficient of application, negative effects, etc.

So that you can avoid this situation, it is strongly recommended that during the phase of number of literary works, choose all materials that could be of good use.

Insufficient level of the review

There are lots of methods to raise the scope associated with the survey:

  • change the wording by entering additional phrases, sentences. Small upsurge in amount.
  • add extra things – the essential method that is radical. You could add not containing information that is important but big by number of data – a historical reference, the etiology regarding the illness. Sometimes information that is such not carrying a semantic load, is really a description of the pathogenesis regarding the illness.
  • if the sources are presented in the form of figures – replace them by “last name + year”, while including several names to the mention of one supply. Allows you to boost the amount to 5 pages.

Inadequate wide range of types of literature

Most frequently there is certainly a insufficient wide range of modern sources. This issue is solved very easily – by searching the literature in the electronic catalogs associated with CB in addition to PubMed database.

The sum total quantity of sources could be increased by the introduction of paragraphs, containing a lot of links and background that is additional, as an example:

Many respected reports of domestic (…) and foreign (…) scientists have now been specialized in the scholarly research associated with the dilemmas of remedy for illness X.

Existence of old sources into the review can also be a characteristic that is negative. The search within the PubMed database allows not only to find interesting info on this issue, but also represents the way that is simplest to fix the issue regarding the not enough recommendations in the last few years.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *